Title: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) |
Posted by: | matthew chenoweth |
Date: | 23 September 2005 |
a question for Anthony Maxwell resulting from this thread: Can we assume that the accuracy of the records you strongly defend are not corrupted by title purchasing - as was so popular a century or so ago - or to record purging - also very popular, and with a history a number of centuries old? I ask because I wrote an historical dissertation on it while at Harvard (i am also a geneaoligist for 20 years now and a member of the Jamestowne Society here) and would like to know that the Maxwell history isn't so tainted. I'm sure you can provide proof? of course your help is greatly appreciated Matthew |
Title: | Date: | Posted By: |
James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 26 January 2003 | Thomas S. (Maxwell)Romansky |
Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 27 December 2003 | Jennifer Foster |
Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 28 December 2003 | Anthony Maxwell |
Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 03 January 2004 | Jennifer Foster |
Re:Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 03 January 2004 | Anthony Maxwell |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 24 September 2004 | Jennifer Foster |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 23 September 2005 | matthew chenoweth |
Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 03 January 2004 | Jennifer Foster |
Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 03 September 2004 | matthew chenoweth |
Re:Re:Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 24 September 2004 | Jennifer Foster |
Re:James Maxwell (Born about 1697) | 29 September 2005 | Pam Maxwell Griffith |